next up previous
Next: Mathematical Treatment Up: Extrapolating the Flare Intensity Previous: Extrapolating the Flare Intensity

Introduction

We wish to use the brightness and spacing of the diffraction pattern to determine the intensity of the flare that creates it. This is often necessary because the flare is so bright that it saturates the 4096 capacity of the Analog to Digital Converter (ADC) of the CCD camera. This method will allow us to greatly increase the effective intensity range of the telescope.

We observed such a flare on May 16, 1999 at 13:49:21 UT. The diffraction pattern is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1: The May 16, 1999 diffraction pattern. The dots fade out at the 9th order, then brighten again as you go out, then fade again to the 18th order, and brighten and fade again. There are 23 visible orders. (The very faint dots are barely visible in the lower left and lower right corners.)
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\epsfxsize = 5in \epsfbox {may16.eps} \end{center} \end{figure}

Another example of a flare can be seen on March 15, 2000 at 18:38:40 UT. The diffraction pattern of this flare can be seen in Fig. 2. The flare is bright enough to produce a diffraction pattern but not enough for the zeroth order to saturate the ADC. This can be used to check our results from the first flare.

Figure 2: The March 15, 2000 diffraction pattern
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}\epsfxsize = 1.3in \epsfbox {brightmarch15.eps}\end{center} \end{figure}

The diffraction is due to a wire mesh, shown in Fig. 3, that supports the aluminum filter at the front of the instrument telescope. The mesh diffracts the incoming light.

Figure 3: A diagram of the wire mesh; $a$ is the distance between openings and $b$ is the width of each opening.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}\epsfxsize = 1.9in \epsfbox {mesh.eps}\end{center} \end{figure}


next up previous
Next: Mathematical Treatment Up: Extrapolating the Flare Intensity Previous: Extrapolating the Flare Intensity
Andrew Lin
2000-06-30